Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Шоу: 20 | 50 | 100
Результаты 1 - 2 de 2
Фильтр
Добавить фильтры

база данных
Годовой диапазон
1.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 23(1): 233, 2023 May 24.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20240730

Реферат

BACKGROUND: Vaccination against the worldwide pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is underway; however, some cases of new onset uveitis after vaccination have been reported. We report a case of bilateral acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy-like (AMPPE-like) panuveitis after COVID-19 vaccination in which the patient's pathological condition was evaluated using multimodal imaging. CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old woman experienced bilateral hyperemia and blurred vision starting 6 days after her second inoculation of the COVID-19 vaccination. At her first visit, her visual acuity was decreased bilaterally, and severe bilateral anterior chamber inflammation and bilateral scattering of cream-white placoid lesions on the fundus were detected. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed serous retinal detachment (SRD) and choroidal thickening in both eyes (OU). Fluorescein angiography (FA) revealed hypofluorescence in the early phase and hyperfluorescence in the late phase corresponding to the placoid legions. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) showed sharply marginated hypofluorescent dots of various sizes throughout the mid-venous and late phases OU. The patient was diagnosed with APMPPE and was observed without any medications. Three days later, her SRD disappeared spontaneously. However, her anterior chamber inflammation continued, and oral prednisolone (PSL) was given to her. Seven days after the patient's first visit, the hyperfluorescent lesions on FA and hypofluorescent dots on ICGA partially improved; however, the patient's best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) recovered only to 0.7 OD and 0.6 OS, and the impairment of the outer retinal layer was broadly detected as hyperautofluorescent lesions on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) examination and as irregularity in or disappearance of the ellipsoid and interdigitation zones on OCT, which were quite atypical for the findings of APMPPE. Steroid pulse therapy was performed. Five days later, the hyperfluorescence on FAF had disappeared, and the outer retinal layer improved on OCT. Moreover, the patient's BCVA recovered to 1.0 OU. Twelve months after the end of treatment, the patient did not show any recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a case of APMPPE-like panuveitis after COVID-19 vaccination featuring some atypical findings for APMPPE. COVID-19 vaccination may induce not only known uveitis but also atypical uveitis, and appropriate treatment is required for each case.


Тема - темы
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Panuveitis , Retinal Detachment , White Dot Syndromes , Adult , Female , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Inflammation , Panuveitis/diagnosis , Panuveitis/etiology , Retina
2.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 140(4): 312-318, 2022 04 01.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1694836

Реферат

IMPORTANCE: Pathological features of ophthalmic aftereffects of COVID-19 are important for new insight in treating patients. OBJECTIVE: To examine the expression of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in lacrimal gland tissues of a patient with COVID-19 and a patient without COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this retrospective case-control study, the case of a 35-year-old woman with positive test results for SARS-CoV-2 who had had lacrimal gland enlargements for 6 months was analyzed. A 43-year-old woman without COVID-19 who had idiopathic chronic bilateral dacryoadenitis served as a negative control. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Histopathology and immunohistochemistry with anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein and ACE2 in the lacrimal glands. RESULTS: Both patients were Japanese women aged 35 years (case) and 43 years (control). Histopathologic findings in the patient with COVID-19 demonstrated marked inflammatory cell infiltration, lymphoid follicles, and germinal center formation in the lacrimal gland. The inflammation was mainly made up of lymphocytes and plasma cells with several polymorphonuclear leukocytes, where the lacrimal glands were atrophic. Of note, a number of lacrimal gland ducts markedly contained eosinophilic materials in the lumens, which indicated glandular damage. Immunoreactivity for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein was noted in the inflammatory cells around the lacrimal gland ductal epithelia. In addition, strong ACE2 expression was noted in the lacrimal gland. In the patient without COVID-19, marked inflammation was noted in the lacrimal gland; however, there were no eosinophilic material deposits in the ductal lumens. SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein immunoreactivity was not observed, whereas ACE2 was expressed in the lacrimal glands. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this case-control study, expression of ACE2 indicated that the lacrimal gland could be a target organ for SARS-CoV-2 to adhere to. Chronic bilateral dacryoadenitis in the patient with COVID-19 showed SARS-CoV-2-positive inflammatory cells with glandular damage, which might be a COVID-19-associated ophthalmic aftereffect.


Тема - темы
COVID-19 , Dacryocystitis , Lacrimal Apparatus , Adult , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 , COVID-19/complications , Case-Control Studies , Dacryocystitis/diagnosis , Dacryocystitis/virology , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Inflammation , Lacrimal Apparatus/pathology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
Критерии поиска